PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATTERNLANGUAGE.COM and
THE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STRUCTURE
|
ARCHITECTS PLANNERS ENGINEERS CONTRACTORS
|
|
The Mountain View Civic Center Painting of a project prepared for the City of Mountain View, California | |
A non-profit corporation,
established in 1967, The
Center for Environmental Structure implements building
projects in which towns, landscape, buildings, gardens, are truly adapted to support human
existence.
CES
provides publicly
accessible models of working processes able to alter the procurement of
buildings throughout the world.
We seek to do this in a fashion which permits the creation of a better
architecture and provides professional and lay people with working models
for new projects in the twenty--first century. Pilot projects of small
and moderate size are gradually to be replaced by projects in which size,
scale, and impact increase, and are able to be competitive with those very
large projects which are now damaging cities and countryside everywhere,
in the United States, in the European world, in Latin America, in Asia,
and in Africa. The projects we take on have as an explicit aim, the purpose
of extending tested mechanisms and processes of implementation to larger
and larger cases which can, within a finite time, begin to have impact
on the conduct of architecture and planning in the world.
|
|
Columbia, Santa Rosa de Cabal, project with
new aims | |
Fundamental to our aims, is the fostering of a certain quality in the built
environment. For convenience, we call this quality life. In a living environment,
as we wish to define it, the people who live and work there are relaxed,
know that they belong there and enjoy a kind of freedom in relation to
the buildings and space around them. They feel and are “at home” in their
world.
In looking around us we can most frequently see this quality in traditional
buildings and towns, where, over the years, people have constructed an
orderly but loose configuration of space, rooms, gardens, houses, and larger
buildings. The later 20th century, for varied and complex reasons, has
not seen much in the way of living buildings and neighborhoods.
The idea of CES is not to engage in a nostalgia for past centuries, but
to develop a modern interpretation of living structures that can speak
to us, our cultural specificity, and to our times, and yet reach this deep
understanding of spatial arrangements that support rather than deny humanity
and ordinary daily events.
Many ingredients are required to make a living structure: an understanding
of space and human response to it, appropriate technology and materials.,
constructing, from the outset, with and for the people who will adopt that
space as their own, and even arranging for the way that money flows for
initial construction, later repairs, adaptation, and growth. The key for
CES is in understanding and developing the processes by which living environments
can come into existence and prosper. |
We believe that people have a right to determine and shape their own environment.
We also believe that they know more details, necessary to the creation
of a good environment, and that good architecture can only come from wholehearted
involvement of the users in the shaping of their buildings and streets.
CES has a long standing commitment to the particular human qualities that
make each country, each people, each region unique, and has wide experience
in cooperation and in paying attention to the subtlety of human value as
it arises in different contexts.
Since 1967, CES has had wide--ranging experiences of participation in different
countries, and in working with peoples of different cultural and ethnic
background, and with people of a wide range of different income levels.

kitchen designed with user
participation

Eishin Campus, Japan,
designed with teachers and students
|
The most fundamental aspect of CES innovation and practice, concerns the
necessity to revise and reconstruct social, technical, banking, and human
process, throughout the field of building and environment.
We are committed to the view that a good, healthy, and beneficial environment
for human beings in the 21st century, can only be created by thoroughgoing
changes in the systems and processes in use during the 20th century.
During the last thirty years we have frequently proposed, and made, innovations
of process. At one time or another, we have proposed changes in almost
all the processes that create buildings, because for over thirty years
we have tried to identify the kinds of process that are capable of creating
a living world. Some of our process innovations include:
-
Analysis of a design task in terms of its functional roots
-
Finite element analysis of complex forms as a method of cycling engineering
solutions
-
Involvement of users and lay people in the design process of their houses
and workplaces
-
Fixed-fee, non--profit management of construction
-
New forms of construction contract
-
Changes in the flow of money
-
Inventions in construction technique designed to create physical processes
that could allow formation of well--adapted, cheap, buildings
-
The nature of the human process that is used to lay out a building
-
The experimental human process needed to improve layout of building interiors
-
Changes in process for consecutive layout and siting of buildings in urban
design and construction of city centers
-
Mechanical innovations in setting out the foundations of a building
-
Innovations in engineering process and analysis to get better results in
engineering design
-
Innovations in public diagnosis of a community environment leading to changes
of process
-
Innovations in the relative order of items in a construction procedure
-
Innovation in the manufacturing process for office furniture designed to
make the furniture better adapted to individual needs
-
Changes in the maintenance of buildings, and the maintenance budget and
its distribution over the lifetime of the building
These innovations have all been innovations of process. We made them because
we knew the value of the living architecture we were trying to achieve
was dependent on changes in process, and could only be created by these
or other equivalent process changes. These process--innovations were often
dismissed as dreaming, as not essential, as too radical for architects
to propose. Nevertheless, experience has taught us that fundamental practical
innovations of process are necessary consequences of thinking correctly
about the nature of life, and of facing honestly the task of creating living
structure in the world.
|
As part of CES efforts to make better, low--cost housing and public buildings,
a wide variety of technical innovations have been introduced. Innovations
include
-
New types of masonry wall
-
Shot concrete wall and vault construction techniques

-
The West Dean wall
-
The Fresno block wall
-
The Mexicali wall
-
The Frankfurt wall
-
Seattle 10" wall
-
Self--centering wall blocks
-
Interlocking multi--masonry wall
-
-
-
New types of vault and ceilings
-
Guna--tile vault
-
Bavra vault
-
Etna street vault
-
Mexicali vault
-
Low cost light weight vaults
-
-
-
New types of studwork and wood structure
-
New types of thick studwork
-
-
Experiments of Agate
-
Monocoque plywood construction for houses
-
Hollow plywood beams and columns
-
-
New types of roof structure and roof surface
-
The Russian roof
-
Concrete trusses
-
-
New types of cabinet and furniture
-
New lights
-
Furniture made of one--by material
-
Shell chair
-
Plastering lath as a base for sofa
-
Rebars as connectors in heavy timber
-
Plywood box beams and columns
-
Two inch shell floor slabs
-
-
Gunite
-
Basket weave shells
-
Thin wall concrete
-
Ultra--thin foundations and slabs
-
Using thin shells for shear reinforcement
-
Dry stacked blocks
-
Cylindrical blocks
-
Tension web
-
Shot concrete trusses
-
Curved member trusses
-
Low cost form--work
-
Pre--cast concrete girder--arches
|
|
COST CONTROL AS FUNDAMENTAL TO THE HEALTH OF THE ENVIRONMENT
A major part of CES work during the last 20 years, has been aimed at cost
control. New forms of construction management contracts, invented and developed
by CES, have provided managed methods of cost control which provide the
client the opportunity to obtain maximum benefit for any given level of
cost, with security of final cost.
Vital to the welfare of the environment, is the possibility of flexible
adaptations during construction, and methods of providing that this flexibility
can be maintained within a guaranteed cost umbrella. Our innovations provide
clients with the advantages of flexibility, without the costs and penalties
and cost--overruns typically encountered when construction proceeds within
existing forms of bidding and cost control.
|
BUDGET MANAGEMENT THROUGH PROGRAM BUDGETING
Direct control of subcontractors, who are required to provide bids working
to a pre--fixed sum, while being permitted to vary the specification of
what is delivered. This form of program budgeting is efficient, highly
cost-effective, and creates a better relationship with subcontractors,
removing the antagonistic relation that exists under existing frameworks,
yet creating large cost advantages for clients.
|
|
LOW COST CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES
New ultra-low-cost construction techniques and new attitudes combine cost-effectiveness,
with maximum benefit per unit of cost to the human considerations in the
environment.
|
|
MAXIMIZATION OF RESOURCE
EFFECTIVENESS
|
New forms of cash flow for housing programs that are based, in part, on
available resources, may be used to maximize the effect of
available cash
flow, while keeping client expectations at a minimum, reduce later burdens
caused by loan indebtedness.
|
|
|
INNOVATIONS IN INTEREST STRUCTURE
Experiments are now under way to encourage mixed use development, through
creative forms of variable interest, thus assigning priorities and different
forms of cost to components, according to their level of social importance.
This has the effect of recovering key components of the urban environment,
which are damaged by present types of interest structure.
|
|

West Dean
College Visitor's Center built for £1100/square meter and estimated value at £2000/square meter
In many projects CES combines with engineering professionals of
other disciplines and provides a wholly innovative and integrated planning
design and construction service; it also frequently engages with other
architectural firms. Here are some the professional organizations we have worked
with.
|
| |
Banco de la Vivienda, Peru
|
The World Bank, Washington DC |
|
Banco de Credito, Baja California
|
Midland Bank, West Sussex |
|
Housing Finance Corporation, London
|
Bank of America, San Francisco |
|
Allott and Lomax, Engineers, Manchester
|
The San Francisco Museums |
|
Prince of Wales's Projects Office, London
|
Helenic Technodomiki S.A. Athens |
|
Fujita Kogyo, Heavy Construction Tokyo
|
Bell Laboratories, Illinois |
|
Joint Center for Urban Studies, Harvard
|
Hajo Neis and Partners Frankfurt |
|
Professor Howard Davis, Eugene
|
Thallon & Edrington, Oregon |
|
The Global Business Network, San Francisco
|
Oliver and Komes, Berkeley |
|
Life Savings Bank, SSB Austin
|
Halim Abdel Halim and Partners, Cairo |
|
Bimal Hasmukh Patel Ahmedabad, India
|
David Week, Sydney |
|
Ken Costigan and Partners, Papua New Guinea
|
Nili Portugali, Tel-Aviv |
|
Ramzi Kawar, Amman, Jordan
|
Moshe Safdie, Boston |
|
Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Cambridge
|
|
|
|
Costruyamos, Colombia | The United Nations |
Herman Miller Corporation |
|
Sun Microsystems | Eishin Gakuen |
The Mary Rose Trust |
|
The City of Pasadena | National Institutes of Health |
H.R.H. The Prince of Wales |
|
The University of Oregon | The City of Nagoya |
The City of Mountain View |
|
The Government of Baja California, Mexico | The Ministry of Works, London |
Hoechst Pharmaceutical, Frankfurt |
|
|
India | Mexico |
Venezuela |
|
Nepal | Samarkand |
Canada |
|
Israel | Alaska |
Japan |
|
Peru | Colombia |
Germany |
|
Papua New Guinea
| Spain |
England |
|
California
| The Homeless, USA
|
Brazil |
|
Austria
| Canary Islands
|
Haitian Americans |
|
Honduras
| Oregon
|
Greece |
|
Students at home at school

Mexicali,
a new home,

A Home
for the Homeless in California
a home
for the homeless in California
|
The Center for Environmental Structure is registered in the United States
as a non-profit corporation of planners, architects, engineers and contractors.
C.E.S. was founded in 1967
PRESIDENT
Christopher Alexander
1996-- Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
1967--98 President, Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley, California.
1963--98 Professor of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley.
1990-97 Trustee, Prince of Wales's Institute for Architecture.
1994 The Seaside Prize, for Contributions to Architecture
1992 Louis Kahn Memorial Lecture, Philadelphia.
1987 Distinguished Professor Award -Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture.
1987 Silver medal, Saitama Prefecture, Tokyo, Japan.
1985 Best building in Japan Award, by the Japan Institute of Architects.
1980 Member of the Swedish Royal Academy.
1972 The Research Gold Medal of the American Institute of Architects
1965 Research Professor in the Humanities, University of California, Berkeley.
1965 Visiting Fellow, Rockefeller Foundation, Villa Serbelloni, Italy.
1961--3 Fellow, Society of Fellows, Harvard University.
1954--8 Trinity College, Cambridge
|
|
PATTERNLANGUAGE.COM
2701 SHASTA ROAD, BERKELEY,
CALIFORNIA 94708
USA
TELEPHONE 1-510-841-6166 FAX 1-510-841-8668
E-MAIL
services@patternlanguage.com
© 2000, PatternLanguage.com Inc.
|
|