Building Process
home page >> building process >> this page
  • Purpose and Aims

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    A non-profit corporation established in 1967, The Center for Environmental Structure (CES) implements building projects in which towns, landscape, buildings, gardens, are truly adapted to support human existence.

    CES provides publicly accessible models of working processes able to alter the procurement of buildings throughout the world.

    We seek to do this in a fashion which permits the creation of a better architecture and provides professional and lay people with working models for new projects in the twenty-first century. Pilot projects of small and moderate size are gradually to be replaced by projects in which size, scale, and impact increase, and are able to be competitive with those very large projects which are now damaging cities and countryside everywhere, in the United States, in the European world, in Latin America, in Asia, and in Africa. The projects we take on have as an explicit aim, the purpose of extending tested mechanisms and processes of implementation to larger and larger cases which can, within a finite time, begin to have impact on the conduct of architecture and planning in the world.

    The Mountain View Civic Center, painting of a project prepared for the City of Mountain View, California
  • Philosophy

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    Fundamental to our aims, is the fostering of a certain quality in the built environment. For convenience, we call this quality life. In a living environment, as we wish to define it, the people who live and work there are relaxed, know that they belong there and enjoy a kind of freedom in relation to the buildings and space around them. They feel and are "at home" in their world.

    In looking around us we can most frequently see this quality in traditional buildings and towns, where, over the years, people have constructed an orderly but loose configuration of space, rooms, gardens, houses, and larger buildings. The later 20th century, for varied and complex reasons, has not seen much in the way of living buildings and neighborhoods.

    The idea of CES is not to engage in a nostalgia for past centuries, but to develop a modern interpretation of living structures that can speak to us, our cultural specificity, and to our times, and yet reach this deep understanding of spatial arrangements that support rather than deny humanity and ordinary daily events.

    Many ingredients are required to make a living structure: an understanding of space and human response to it, appropriate technology and materials, constructing, from the outset, with and for the people who will adopt that space as their own, and even arranging for the way that money flows for initial construction, later repairs, adaptation, and growth. The key for CES is in understanding and developing the processes by which living environments can come into existence and prosper.

    Columbia, Santa Rosa de Cabal, a project with new aims
  • User Participation

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    We believe that people have a right to determine and shape their own environment. We also believe that they know more details, necessary to the creation of a good environment, and that good architecture can only come from wholehearted involvement of the users in the shaping of their buildings and streets.

    CES has a long standing commitment to the particular human qualities that make each country, each people, each region unique, and has wide experience in cooperation and in paying attention to the subtlety of human value as it arises in different contexts.

    Since 1967, CES has had wide-ranging experiences of participation in different countries, and in working with peoples of different cultural and ethnic background, and with people of a wide range of different income levels. Please see below for examples of people with whom we have worked.

    Eishin Campus, Japan, designed with teachers and students
  • Process Innovation

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    The most fundamental aspect of CES innovation and practice, concerns the necessity to revise and reconstruct social, technical, banking, and human process, throughout the field of building and environment.

    We are committed to the view that a good, healthy, and beneficial environment for human beings in the 21st century, can only be created by thoroughgoing changes in the systems and processes in use during the 20th century.

    During the last thirty years we have frequently proposed, and made, innovations of process. At one time or another, we have proposed changes in almost all the processes that create buildings, because for over thirty years we have tried to identify the kinds of process that are capable of creating a living world. Some of our process innovations include:

    • Analysis of a design task in terms of its functional roots
    • Finite element analysis of complex forms as a method of cycling engineering solutions
    • Involvement of users and lay people in the design process of their houses and workplaces
    • Fixed-fee, non-profit management of construction
    • New forms of construction contract
    • Changes in the flow of money
    • Inventions in construction technique designed to create physical processes that could allow formation of well-adapted, cheap, buildings
    • The nature of the human process that is used to lay out a building
    • The experimental human process needed to improve layout of building interiors
    • Changes in process for consecutive layout and siting of buildings in urban design and construction of city centers
    • Mechanical innovations in setting out the foundations of a building
    • Innovations in engineering process and analysis to get better results in engineering design
    • Innovations in public diagnosis of a community environment leading to changes of process
    • Innovations in the relative order of items in a construction procedure
    • Innovation in the manufacturing process for office furniture designed to make the furniture better adapted to individual needs
    • Changes in the maintenance of buildings, and the maintenance budget and its distribution over the lifetime of the building

    These innovations have all been innovations of process. We made them because we knew the value of the living architecture we were trying to achieve was dependent on changes in process, and could only be created by these or other equivalent process changes. These process-innovations were often dismissed as dreaming, as not essential, as too radical for architects to propose. Nevertheless, experience has taught us that fundamental practical innovations of process are necessary consequences of thinking correctly about the nature of life, and of facing honestly the task of creating living structure in the world.

  • Technical Innovation

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    As part of CES efforts to make better, low-cost housing and public buildings, a wide variety of technical innovations have been introduced. Innovations include:

    • New types of masonry wall
    • Shot concrete wall and vault construction techniques
    • The West Dean wall
    • The Fresno block wall
    • The Mexicali wall
    • The Frankfurt wall
    • Seattle 10" wall
    • Self-centering wall blocks
    • Interlocking multi-masonry wall
    • New types of vault and ceilings
    • Guna-tile vault
    • Bavra vault
    • Etna street vault
    • Mexicali vault
    • Low cost light weight vaults
    • New types of studwork and wood structure
    • New types of thick studwork
    • Experiments of Agate
    • Monocoque plywood construction for houses
    • Hollow plywood beams and columns
    • New types of roof structure and roof surface
    • The Russian roof
    • Concrete trusses
    • New types of cabinet and furniture
    • New lights
    • Furniture made of one—by material
    • Shell chair
    • Plastering lath as a base for sofa
    • Rebars as connectors in heavy timber
    • Plywood box beams and columns
    • Two inch shell floor slabs
    • Gunite
    • Basket weave shells
    • Thin wall concrete
    • Ultra-thin foundations and slabs
    • Using thin shells for shear reinforcement
    • Dry stacked blocks
    • Cylindrical blocks
    • Tension web
    • Shot concrete trusses
    • Curved member trusses
    • Low cost form-work
    • Pre-cast concrete girder-arches
  • Cost Reduction and Control

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    COST CONTROL AS FUNDAMENTAL TO THE HEALTH OF THE ENVIRONMENT

    A major part of CES work during the last 20 years, has been aimed at cost control. New forms of construction management contracts, invented and developed by CES, have provided managed methods of cost control which provide the client the opportunity to obtain maximum benefit for any given level of cost, with security of final cost.

    Vital to the welfare of the environment, is the possibility of flexible adaptations during construction, and methods of providing that this flexibility can be maintained within a guaranteed cost umbrella. Our innovations provide clients with the advantages of flexibility, without the costs and penalties and cost-overruns typically encountered when construction proceeds within existing forms of bidding and cost control.

    BUDGET MANAGEMENT THROUGH PROGRAM BUDGETING

    Direct control of subcontractors, who are required to provide bids working to a pre-fixed sum, while being permitted to vary the specification of what is delivered. This form of program budgeting is efficient, highly cost-effective, and creates a better relationship with subcontractors, removing the antagonistic relation that exists under existing frameworks, yet creating large cost advantages for clients.

    LOW COST CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

    New ultra-low-cost construction techniques and new attitudes combine cost-effectiveness, with maximum benefit per unit of cost to the human considerations in the environment.

    MAXIMIZATION OF RESOURCE EFFECTIVENESS

    New forms of cash flow for housing programs that are based, in part, on available resources, may be used to maximize the effect of available cash flow, while keeping client expectations at a minimum, reduce later burdens caused by loan indebtedness.

    INNOVATIONS IN INTEREST STRUCTURE

    Experiments are now under way to encourage mixed use development, through creative forms of variable interest, thus assigning priorities and different forms of cost to components, according to their level of social importance. This has the effect of recovering key components of the urban environment, which are damaged by present types of interest structure.

  • Associated Organizations

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    In many projects CES combines with engineering professionals of other disciplines and provides a wholly innovative and integrated planning design and construction service; it also frequently engages with other architectural firms. Here are some the professional organizations we have worked with.



    • Banco de la Vivienda, Peru
    • The World Bank, Washington DC
    • Banco de Credito, Baja California
    • Midland Bank, West Sussex
    • Housing Finance Corporation, London
    • Bank of America, San Francisco
    • Allott and Lomax, Engineers, Manchester
    • The San Francisco Museums
    • Prince of Wales's Projects Office, London
    • Helenic Technodomiki S.A. Athens
    • Fujita Kogyo, Heavy Construction, Tokyo
    • Bell Laboratories, Illinois
    • Joint Center for Urban Studies, Harvard
    • Hajo Neis and Partners, Frankfurt
    • Professor Howard Davis, Eugene
    • Thallon & Edrington, Oregon
    • The Global Business Network, San Francisco
    • Oliver and Komes, Berkeley
    • Life Savings Bank, SSB Austin
    • Halim Abdel Halim and Partners, Cairo
    • Bimal Hasmukh Patel Ahmedabad, India
    • David Week, Sydney
    • Ken Costigan and Partners, Papua New Guinea
    • Nili Portugali, Tel-Aviv
    • Ramzi Kawar, Amman, Jordan
    • Moshe Safdie, Boston
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
  • Clients

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    Some of our better known clients:



    • Costruyamos, Colombia
    • Sun Microsystems
    • The City of Pasadena
    • The University of Oregon
    • The Government of Baja California, Mexico
    • The United Nations
    • Eishin Gakuen
    • National Institutes of Health
    • The City of Nagoya
    • The Ministry of Works, London
    • The Mary Rose Trust
    • Herman Miller Corporation
    • H.R.H The Prince of Wales
    • The City of Mountain View
    • Hoechst Pharmaceutical, Frankfurt
  • Countries

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    Countries and people we have worked with:



    • India
    • Nepal
    • Israel
    • Peru
    • Papua New Guinea
    • California
    • Austria
    • Honduras
    • Mexico
    • Samarkand
    • Alaska
    • Colombia
    • Spain
    • The Homeless, USA
    • Canary Islands
    • Oregon
    • Venezuela
    • Canada
    • Japan
    • Germany
    • England
    • Brazil
    • Haitian Americans
    • Greece
  • Trustees

    • Purpose and Aims
    • Philosophy
    • User Participation
    • Process Innovation
    • Technical Innovation
    • Cost Reduction and Control
    • Associated Professional Organizations
    • Clients
    • Countries
    • Trustees

    The Center for Environmental Structure is registered in the United States as a non-profit corporation of planners, architects, engineers and contractors. C.E.S. was founded in 1967.



    President: Christopher Alexander

    • 1996— Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
    • 1967— President, Center for Environmental Structure, Berkeley, California
    • 1963— Professor of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley (now Emeritus)
    • 1990-97 Trustee, Prince of Wales's Institute for Architecture
    • 1994 The Seaside Prize, for Contributions to Architecture
    • 1992 Louis Kahn Memorial Lecture, Philadelphia
    • 1987 Distinguished Professor Award, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture
    • 1987 Silver medal, Saitama Prefecture, Tokyo, Japan
    • 1985 Best building in Japan Award, by the Japan Institute of Architects
    • 1980 Member of the Swedish Royal Academy
    • 1972 The Research Gold Medal of the American Institute of Architects
    • 1965 Research Professor in the Humanities, University of California, Berkeley
    • 1965 Visiting Fellow, Rockefeller Foundation, Villa Serbelloni, Italy
    • 1961-3 Fellow, Society of Fellows, Harvard University
    • 1954-8 Trinity College, Cambridge

    Board of Trustees: Maggie Moore Alexander, Artemis Anninou, Lily Alexander

    Web Master: Sophie Alexander

These tools allow anyone, and any group of people, to create beautiful, functional, meaningful places.
You can create a living world.

©2001-2013 patternlanguage.com